practical job of Philosophy: Nietzsche and his critics [Tiago Suárez Lavandera]
Slogan:
Slogan: Think about the text that follows on the basis of the concepts learned in Nietzsche. There are certain categories of interpretation that you have known recently (for example, the concept of truth as a metaphor) and can analyze, display, further reading of the text using these categories. Then, with the ideas of Foucault, Heidegger and Rorty compose a critical text which develops new interpretive ideas from the text. You can make a review from these authors, or perform an array of ideas to enrich the look of Nietzsche new perspectives.
print this text and attach it to work. It must rise to the TP blog delivered simultaneously with the paper.
Posthumous Writings
5 [3]
We put the word where our ignorance begins, where we can not see beyond, for example: the word "I", the word "do", the word "suffering", they are perhaps the lines of the horizon our knowledge, but not "truths"
5 [22]
fundamental solution: we believe in reason, but this is the philosophy of concepts gray The language is built on the most naive prejudices. Now read on things dissonances and problems we have introduced ourselves because we think only in the form of language and for that reason, we believe the "eternal truth" of "reason" for example, subject, predicate, etc. . We stop thinking if we want to do under constriction language, we come to doubt see here is a limit as a limit.
Rational thought is interpretation according to a scheme that we can not release
6 [8]
[.. .] our living conditions prescribed by general laws within which we see, can see shapes, figures, legislation
9 [60]
(46) Huge act of self : becoming conscious of himself not as an individual but as humanity. Reconsider, think back: tour the small and large ways.
Man seeks "truth": a world that does not contradict, do not cheat, do not change, a real world -a world in which not suffer: contradiction, deceit, change-causes of suffering!. The man has no doubt that there is a world as it should be, would find the road leading to it-(Critical Hindu: even the "I" as apparent as not-real).
Where
takes the man in this case the concept of reality ?
Why suffering derives precisely change, deception, contradiction? Why not rather his bliss? ... "The contempt, the hatred of everything that happens, it changes and becomes: - Where does this assessment of the permanent?
Obviously, here the will of Truth is the simple desire to meet with a world of permanent.
The senses deceive, the reason corrects the errors: consequently, we conclude that the reason is the way to the permanent ideas that are less than the senses should be closer to the "world true. "
"From the senses from the biggest blows of misfortune, they are deceivers, seducers, annihilating.
The that can only be guaranteed as it is: change and that are excluded. The supreme desire is given to identifying what it is. This is the curious way to the highest bliss.
In short: the world as should be there, this world we live in is only our world error- should not exist.
The belief in what appears only [as] a simple consequence: the true primum mobile is the lack of faith in what becomes, the distrust of deviniente, contempt to all becoming ...
What kind of man thinks this way? A kind suffering, unproductive, tired sort of life. If we counter the species is listed as a man, it would not need a belief in what it is: but still, would despise him dead, bored, indifferent ...
The belief that the world as it should be is , there really is an unproductive belief not want to create a world should be. They erected to exist, seek ways and means to access it. - "Will truth" as impotence of the will to create .
[...]
9 [89]
is required acceptance of the body to think and infer: the only logical ways to handle things stable.
why this acceptance would have no probative value for the reality: 'the local' is part of our optics.
The "I" as being (untouched by the evolution and development).
The world fictional subject, the substance of "reason" and so on. necessary: \u200b\u200bin us a power sequencing, simplifies, fake, artificially separated. 'Truth' will become owner of the multiplicity of sensations, stringing phenomena under specific categories. In this part of the belief in the "in itself" of things (we phenomena as real ).
The character of the world to come as unformulated as "false" as "contradicting".
knowledge and become mutually exclusive.
therefore "knowledge" has to be something else: it must precede a willingness to do-cognizable, a species of evolution have to create the illusion of being.
Philosophy Practical work: Nietzsche and his critics
Analysis:
5 [3] and 5 [22]
In these two sentences quoted from Nietzsche can see how important it was for him the problem of the influence of the grammar in society and particularly in philosophy, because in the end was that the man who led them to certain conclusions and not to others. That is, because of the invention and the existence of words like "being," I "or" truth "is that it comes a whole branch of thought in which they develop, for example, beliefs entities endowed with traits permanent and proper, essential and universal nature, and ultimately favor a substantial understanding of reality.
According to Nietzsche, this is one reason, among others, to the existence of metaphysics as we know, and his long stay in the philosophy throughout history. In his view, s i our grammar were different, our way of seeing and understanding the world would be different, but how was from the way in which it developed the grammar, metaphysics seems to have been a point which would be necessary to go sooner or later.
In its extensive critique of metaphysics, Nietzsche believes that this and other issues is that it is a source of ignorance, a word actually used in the first of the above phrases. Try to show for it that metaphysics is that limit after which we can not see nothing else which "begins our ignorance." But it said that not to be confused with truth to such limits, since not that we do not understand or not be able to see them means that it is not true. There are truths that will certainly exceed the man and escape from their hands (if there are some that do not).
This point of origin of metaphysics is attached to other Nietzsche postulates two sources: first, the invention of the rational world began in Plato's theory which divides reality into two worlds, one real linked to reason, and one apparently linked to the senses. And encompassing the above, the second source is postulated as a psychological origin of Platonism and the Metaphysics, in which the metaphysical categories as substance, being, essence, or unit are pure inventions for them to find the rest regularity and quiet away from the only existing world, which is offered to the senses. The latter is more related to the second date ( 5 [22]) , suggesting an intrinsic circular relationship between language and reason, in which one justifies the other and vice versa, and that is why when one disappears, so does the other, as Nietzsche says when he explains that " stop thinking if we want to do under the constraint of language. "
6 [8]
Nietzsche in this quote is to convey that what we see when we look customarily, for example, an object is no longer the object itself, but what it represents to us depending on the value we provide. Specifically, once the shares become habitual, they become automatic (there is a process automation). And I do not perceive the object in its overall constitution, but through the most characteristic features or their place in our world around (different for everyone). That is why Nietzsche uses the word "prescribed" talking about the relationship between our conditions and general laws, since it is precisely what happens, first determine (synonymous prescribe) to the latter.
9 [60]
I developed here is the concept of nihilism which Nietzsche devotes a considerable part of work. Nihilism comes precisely from "nothing" ( "nihil" ) word that refers in the quote in question, referring to the new beliefs and ideas modern (for its time), again leading to the belief and desire the stable, permanent, eternal, and never to what changes and transforms.
In this quote Nietzsche criticizes essentially those who believe that "what ought to be" living there and finding a way leading to it, whereupon arose, among other things, religion, instead of believing that "what should be there" and should let the force of will. From here you think the "will to truth as impotence of will to create."
Nietzsche himself is an ardent nihilistic active type, which seeks the complete destruction of all existing values \u200b\u200band their replacement by radically new phase necessary for the emergence of a new moment in history and a new morality. It differs from passive nihilistic type in which the latter do not believe in any value, considering that every value is possible only if God exists, and what has been said, God does not exist, which leads to total loss of faith in everything. Furthermore, since even the appearance of nihilism is believed that life had meaning because it was something outside, with the death of God, life becomes meaningless, leaving the man in despair.
Bibliography:
- Nietzsche, F. (trans. 1998) On Truth and Lies in extramoral sense, Madrid: Tecnos.
- http://www.nietzscheana.com.ar, Horacio Potel.
- http://www.e-torredebabel.com, Javier Echegoyen Olleta .
[Tiago Suárez Lavandera]